|
|
|
|
|
|
by ogurechny
1777 days ago
|
|
|
One can invent a biological explanation for anything, that's the problem. The “instincts” in that reasoning is a stereotype anyway. Another problem is that “childhood” is pretty recent invention (there's enough popular and scholar literature on that). What you mean as a “child” is not what someone meant mere couple of hundreds years ago. And kids actually died all the time through the whole human history, whether “protected” or not. |
|
|
I think that would almost be a point in favour of the idea. The response to CSAM is, frankly, irrationally strong in the modern era. As with many human emotions it looks to me like something calibrated for a different time and altered circumstances.
It is a lazy theory though.