|
|
|
|
|
by SahAssar
1774 days ago
|
|
I don't know the reasoning being not doing it, but I'd guess it's related to those DB engines not being geared or interested in embedded use-cases and that no SQL engine seems to entirely agree with any other how to handle certain parts of SQL. |
|
Regarding the SQL dialect - that could have been handled by specifying a standard SQL dialect that's then dynamically translated to the target engine's dialetc.