[cratermoon]

> With normal review cycle times, this would slow things very much.

Compared to how much it would slow things down having to try to revert or correct a commit that both fixes a bug and introduces a feature? Especially if that change involved any sort of DB schema change that had to be reverted.

Anyone who has ever gone to production with a set of changes that involved an important bug fix and introduced a high-value feature, only to find that the whole thing had to be reverted because of a bug in the new feature, re-introducing the bug to customers, knows the importance of small, separable changes.