|
|
|
|
|
by jlongster
1771 days ago
|
|
Yeah, it adds to the absurdity of all of this. Although I do empathize with browers vendors. I worked at Mozilla at the time and was aware that this is a lot of things to think about when integrating something onto the web. I get why it happened, but practically speaking maybe it should have won. It's not like Chrome seems to care much about cross-browser standards these days. I'm hopeful for a storage layer like this though: https://web.dev/storage-foundation/ It might actually be a better outcome if we get a storage layer with close to native performance, and then you can compile and db/lib/etc and it gets to use it. |
|