| > The science on this is clear, please update your stance. You are conflating science with "stats". > Natural immunity is not as protective as vaccine induced immunity. If that is true and if the science is clear, then why is that the case? What is the biological mechanism behind that? Shouldn't natural immunity be better in most cases since your body is actually fighting the real disease? Since you say the "science is clear", can you explain the science behind it? > It is in fact 2.3x more likely that you will get reinfected while unvaccinated, and a stronger immune response from the vaccine means fewer people end up hospitalized. See: From your link... "Finally, this is a retrospective study design using data from a single state during a 2-month period; therefore, these findings cannot be used to infer causation. Additional prospective studies with larger populations are warranted to support these findings." So you say the science is clear and then you link to a study that explicitly says not to infer any causation? You literally spread FUD and misinformation. As seems to be the case of so many invested in this covid narrative on both sides. |
And why should that be? Because natural is always better? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
Vaccines produce a different and sometimes stronger response than the disease that they mimic, as they are literally designed to do.
In answer to your question: no, there is no "should" about it at all. it could go either way. And when it goes the wrong way, people try to redesign the vaccines until it goes the other way.
There is some evidence that COVID vaccines produce stronger responses. Links upthread.
> You literally spread FUD and misinformation
Please check yourself before flinging that accusation.