|
|
|
|
|
by haolez
1772 days ago
|
|
I get autocomplete and goto definition with dynamic languages just fine. And I make mistakes that static typing could have helped, but then again they are not frequent enough to justify the bureaucracy (and they don't break production). Of course, there is no general rule. This is true for the type of projects that I've been recently working on, which are small-scale distributed web systems. If a new project demands a rigorous type system, I would probably go to something like PureScript[0] before going to C# clones like TypeScript. It seems that the compiler would help me a lot more in a language like that. [0]https://www.purescript.org/ |
|
No you don't. See how autocomplete does with this function:
Now try it with type annotations: