[nothinggoesaway]

This would be an appropriate riposte to [1], a vitriolic comment that draws the line between VC money and Electron, but not to parent.

Parent makes a lot of sense, actually, in context of the submission headline. There was no misinformation here at all.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28145755

[jl_agilebits]

Thank you for pointing me to that thread. I'll make sure to respond there as well.

I did (incorrectly) assume that the parent was talking about Electron, so that's my bad. That being said, our decision to move away from licensing is absolutely not being driven by VC funding, so the parent comment is also spreading misinformation. We were building a subscription-based model all the way back in 2014, and we're phasing out licenses for the host of reasons that were mentioned in the original article.

[marcinzm]

In my experience the impact of VC money isn't directly seen by engineers but is rather a subtle top down shift in direction. Growth matters more, revenue matters more, existing users matter a bit less versus future users, features that impede this are removed, etc. Feature direction shifts slowly but surely.

The goal of a VC company is to either grow big or die. That's it. Risky bets at the expense of existing users are expected if current growth does not meet expectations. Worst case everyone quits the app and you go bankrupt. VCs expect that 9 time out of 10 so no big deal as long as the 10th makes it big.