|
|
|
|
|
|
by danhak
1778 days ago
|
|
|
Do you similarly feel that comparisons across different populations are invalid for arguing the affirmative? e.g. arguments like "we should try masking / UBI / $15 minimum wage / free healthcare / universal pre-k because it worked well in ${location}" are also "not how this works" because we can "only compare with the future that wasn't?" Do such arguments need to control for the infinite number of confounding variables before having any value? |
|
|