|
|
|
|
|
by culturestate
1774 days ago
|
|
> NCMEC's CSAM database already includes images that are not necessarily illegal. How could this be the case? If it's been determined to be CSAM then it is, by definition, illegal. If it were true that the database is likely to contain legal material, how would we possibly know about it, given that the contents of the database are secret? |
|
Certain images are CSAM by _context_. They do not necessarily require those within the image to be abused, but rather that the image at one time or another was traded alongside other CSAM.
> If it were true that the database is likely to contain legal material, how would we possibly know about it, given that the contents of the database are secret?
Tools like Spotlight [0] make use of the database, so certain well-known images are known to flag. Such as Nirvana's controversial cover for Nevermind.
[0] https://www.wired.com/story/how-facial-recognition-fighting-...