|
|
|
|
|
|
by void_mint
1774 days ago
|
|
|
The original question: > What evidence would convince you? Your post history definitely brings to light that, for you, no amount of evidence would convince you, because you refuse to acknowledge discrimination as a possibility. > Would you bet everything that you have on YC being discriminatory (I assume you would because you said "With a reasonably sized sample, no, it really couldn't.")? Definitely, it wouldn't even be a question. > Could it be, maybe, just maybe, that people under 35 are more likely to produce more value on average and that's why investors choose them? The sealion strikes again! "It can't be discrimination if I can think of any other possibility". That's the value in large datasets. |
|
|