Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by spacebear 1778 days ago
Unfortunately, phones are most people’s primary computer.
1 comments

> If people could understand what computing was about, the iPhone would not be a bad thing. But because people don’t understand what computing is about, they think they have it in the iPhone, and that illusion is as bad as the illusion that Guitar Hero is the same as a real guitar.

-- Alan Kay, https://www.fastcompany.com/40435064/what-alan-kay-thinks-ab...

Nce theory. And yet smartphones have delivered far more real world computing to users than the "real computing" ever did.
There is no formal definition of computing which is furthered by iPhones.

I have an iPhone, and pythonista is the only potential thing which fulfils the criteria of "computing", everything else is convenience.

Smartphones have done an incredible amount at bringing the consumption of the internet, audio, video and rich communication via social media.

But they have not brought "real world computing", because "real world computing" is any goal-oriented activity requiring, benefiting from, or creating computing machinery. It includes the study and experimentation of algorithmic processes and development of both hardware and software. It has scientific, engineering, mathematical, technological and social aspects.

You might want to read the wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computing

ACM tried to define it:

>"In a general way, we can define computing to mean any goal-oriented activity requiring, benefiting from, or creating computers. Thus, computing includes designing and building hardware and software systems for a wide range of purposes; processing, structuring, and managing various kinds of information; doing scientific studies using computers; making computer systems behave intelligently; creating and using communications and entertainment media; finding and gathering information relevant to any particular purpose, and so on. The list is virtually endless, and the possibilities are vast."

I basically would half agree that iPhone brought more computing. Based on practical applications, iPhone has not brought radically more computing. iPhone replaced some stationary computing with ultra-mobile computing.

Cheap feature phones, that allowed people in Africa to make cashless payments, brought more computing to ordinary people... than expensive iPhone - that is owned by people who have/had other computers.

People who formally require computing - engineers(all kinds, incl software and structural), data collectors, music professionals and so on - still rely on other forms of computing. Some have shifted to iPad, which made computing more fun. But then all of the heavier forms of computing - they are still done on a "computer", not a phone or iPad.

Phones have delivered social networks, cat pictures and mobile games to the masses, that's about it, really.