|
|
|
|
|
by skinkestek
1769 days ago
|
|
Problem one is Apple doesn't know what they are scanning for. This is by design and actually a good thing. It becomes a problem because problem number 2: No one is accountable if someone gets their life ruined over a mistake in this database. I'd actually be somewhat less hostile to this idea if there was more regulatory oversight: - laws that punishes police/officials if innocent people are harmed in any way - mandatory technical audits as well as verification that for what it is used for: Apple keeps logs of all signatures that "matched"/triggered as well as raw files, these are provided to the court as part of any case that comes up. This way we could hopefully prevent most fishing expeditions - both wide and personalized ones - and also avoid any follow up parallel reconstructions. I'm not saying I'd necessarily be OK with it but at that point there would be something to discuss. |
|