|
|
|
|
|
|
by PikachuEXE
1772 days ago
|
|
|
Biggest problem is "who govern the governors" What is the feedback when such system is abused > Existing images of CSAM that have been acquired and validated by X organizations Will Apple be considered as responsible? punished?
Will Apple or the X publish the list of images and allow regular 3rd party validation? (I see security related product companies do that) In this era it's hard, VERY hard to entrust our private properties to these giant tech companies. There is so little to NO negative feedback to their mis-behaviours. These companies need more regulations than individual citizens. |
|
|
Child protection is an exception to all standards of due process in the US and Europe. There is NO organization that can interfere when people get mistreated based on these laws (the vast majority that fall victim to "side effects" are children, of course). Only generic "quality assurance" is done. There is no protection at all for individuals, whether children, parents, or third parties.
> Will Apple be considered as responsible? punished?
The EU court has judged just a few months ago that child protection authorities cannot be held responsible for the damage they cause, EVEN if it is shown that their actions were based on incomplete or wrong data.
> In this era it's hard, VERY hard to entrust our private properties to these giant tech companies.
Okay, well if you think this is a serious problem, then let me tell you what else social services data is being used for. In Belgium, social services, including homeless shelters, enter data into your medical records which you can't see, erase, or ... emergency departments will read this data, and use it to avoid the situation that they have to use the state insurance for non-insured persons, which is a polite wording for "refusing care to homeless persons".