[mekoka]

I'm not sure that I get the point of your analogy.

To be clear, I'm saying that genetic match supersedes any list of superficial attributes to determine identity. If it's established that X and Y are an 89% DNA match, even though X tastes and looks like Z, the fact that Y and Z belong in distant genetic branches should be enough to dismiss X as a possible Z.

[fieldcny]

Humans and chimps share 98% of their DNA, We also share like 84% with pigs.

89% doesn’t really seem like a case closed kind of stat.

[mekoka]

You should look up DNA barcoding. We don't have an 84% barcode match with pigs.

[darkerside]

My point is that being an 89% match doesn't necessarily mean very much.