|
|
|
|
|
by trashtester
1780 days ago
|
|
Swords are terribly effective weapons for infantry with enough protective gear to close in with spearmen, for armies who could not only afford the sword, but also the shield and armor needed for that. The Romans learned this from the celts early on, and went on to conquer the Mediterranian. Against the heavy knights of the Medieval period, swords were pretty useless for infantry, though. And at the end of the Middle Ages, when pikes had regained the dominant position for the infantry, armor had become so effective that regular swords would have trouble penetrating. During the 14th anc 15th century, halberds and poleaxes and specialist greatswords would would fill the role that the gladius had 1500 years before, ie that of being able to decisively defeat the pikes after closing in. (Although, until gunpowder weapons took over, pikes were still the most frequent weapon, as the defence against cavalry was still necessary). |
|