Why not read the actual Twitter thread and see if the argument has merit? Or engage the summary that the GP brought into the thread instead of pretending the only relevant point in play is the authority of Palmer?
And finally, why not acknowledge that maybe someone who created a coin that took off might have some worthwhile insight?
I did read it. Not super impressed, but glad he has the freedom to say what he wants.
Yes, crypto is being manipulated and distorted by the wealthy and powerful. It's sad to see. But it's still beneficial to the average person to have other options outside of the current system.
Why not read the actual Twitter thread and see if the argument has merit? Or engage the summary that the GP brought into the thread instead of pretending the only relevant point in play is the authority of Palmer?
And finally, why not acknowledge that maybe someone who created a coin that took off might have some worthwhile insight?