|
|
|
|
|
by u10
1772 days ago
|
|
> possessing CP to automatically considering them a child molester, yet someone posessing an action movie is not considered a murderer That's specious reasoning. Someone who posesses an action movie likes action movies, while someone who posesses child porn likes child porn. One is ok, the other is pretty vile and illegal for a reason. I don't agree with Apple on this but let's be clear on what is and what isn't |
|
Unless it's planted. [0] Or sent to you. [1] Or (farther out there) happens to be embedded on a site you visited and ends up in your browser cache.
[0]: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/world/europe/vladimir-put...
[1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/nyregion/alex-jones-sandy...