| > My point is that we don't call Netflix "Netflix for white people" Well, no, because Netflix is the example that defines the segment; that dominant incumbents tend to be focussed on the preferences of the dominant socioeconomic cultural segment, which is predominantly White in the United States, is...not a novel observation. For many people, IOW, the “for White people” is implied. > My initial comment that stared this sub-thread is that I see a social utility to having content "for women" since it's motivated by biology Content “for women” is often not “motivated by biology”, but, more to the point... > but I don't see a social utility to having content "for black people" Who cares? It’s not seeking government subsidy, or proposing the existence of a social (externalized) good, its proposing meeting an unmet private need. |