|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
1772 days ago
|
|
> why this is contentious, but "X for Women" is not seen as contentious. “X for Women” is seen as contentious. In fact, “X for Women" articles on HN often have all the same arguments, with gender in place of race, as this thread, with very slight changes, with focus on serving the unmet needs of women with regard to X painted as sexist and equivalent to external regulation based on gender role stereotypes just as this is compared to state-mandated segregated services. |
|