| So I guess the claims in the articles are not "debunked" solidly. Not sure why you claimed it. > (1) you have serious concerns about possible side effects
> (2) you have serious concerns about efficiacy
> (3) there is no pandemic going on
> (4) you want to market your product Please provide citation for this claim for the list of pre-conditions for phase 2 trials. >so they decided to monitor the first couple of million vaccinations closely Where is this data? Is it publicly available, and was it based on voluntary reporting? >because the number of people that have now been vaccinated is orders of magnitude larger than the largest ever phase 2 trial. I see this flawed logic getting thrown around, again, and again, and again. I don't think that "number of people vaccinated" does not without a control group where no one is following up and based on voluntary reporting is substitute of a clinical trial. Why do you think such observational data is sufficient, when all the health agencies have rejected such observational results when it comes to things like Ivermectin? So again, two questions. Citations for the pre-conditions and data from the initial couple of million vaccinations? |
Because they were falsified. Ok, I'm done with you, you are in the position of having walked into the hard science department looking for confirmation for your pet conspiracy theories, it isn't going to happen so please stop dumping your junk on HN, thank you.