Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gtirloni 1786 days ago
I wouldn't take this at face value. It's more likely that they already wanted to do the layoffs and just put the burden on the employees.
1 comments

Exactly what I was thinking. Pure speculation, but they needed to do a big layoff so they come up with a "process" instead of making the news "we're not doing well so we had to lay off 150 people".