|
|
|
|
|
by scottious
1787 days ago
|
|
yeah -- your app is coupled to those services. I've definitely written code before that depended on a third party API only to have that API break on me. Granted, this is not something to worry about with S3 or SQS. > If we go with your definition then my app is a monolith with S3 and SQS okay sure, I agree that calling your app a monolith with S3 and SQS is ridiculous. The point is that we all may think that we're writing another S3 or SQS when we write our own micro-services. However, in practice maintaining a stable, backwards compatible, public API like that is quite costly and we usually end up re-implementing function calls as HTTP requests and then calling it "loosely coupled". |
|