The article is sexist from the title... it is gender specific from the beginning for no apparent economic or societal reason other than to be outright sexist.
It's not mentioned in the article, but the unemployment rate among men is higher than among women. Even if it weren't, there is absolutely nothing sexist about an article which addresses unemployment for one sex to the exclusion of the other, just as there would be nothing racist about an article on unemployment among blacks, whites, et cetera.