|
|
|
|
|
|
by some_chap
1773 days ago
|
|
|
So many problems with that assertion... You've got very low expectations if you count those as "good" services - trying to travel with one small child would be challenging, two is likely to be stressful, even before the issues of getting from the station to the destination for one, let alone a family... Then there's the costs, in both time and money... There are certain people for whom current EV's don't make sense - from what she say's, she's currently one of them. Maybe not ideal, but in the real-world, that's sometimes the way it is. Doesn't mean that the issues shouldn't be addressed, but not all obstacles can be avoided at a reasonable cost. |
|
|
A fair point. "Workable" is probably better.
> trying to travel with one small child would be challenging, two is likely to be stressful
Sure but I know a lot of people who manage that regularly on similar routes without having to resort to cars.
> Maybe not ideal, but in the real-world, that's sometimes the way it is.
Sure but if you're a top-level government climate spokesperson, using an old diesel car because "you don't want to stop to charge" in an EV and you seemingly haven't even considered trains is a very bad look.