|
|
|
|
|
by xibalba
1779 days ago
|
|
This is an important difference, and, for me at least, the difference between disagreeing (“ban the tool”) and agreeing (“make non-consensual nude distribution illegal”) with the proposal. It’s a shame the headline communicates the former when it seems the proposal is the latter. |
|
Because a headline blubbing about AI-X-ray-specs grabs attention. Making people more likely to click the link.
You can see the effect in action right here: the link made it to the top of the front page in less than an hour of being submitted.
Besides that tough, the article does contain the typical misunderstanding of politicians about how software works ("software developers should be forced make $SOFTWARE so that it can't do $MY_SPECIAL_EXCEPTION_CASE"), which is problematic per se, unrelated to any machine learning aspect.