Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by diegoperini 1776 days ago
So the mentioned 40% is a lie? Otherwise the headline seems accurate.
2 comments

Also the description "facial ID authentication systems". An accurate headline would be "we were able to confuse some open-source face recognition systems"
They're beating facial recognition systems, not facial authentication systems.
It is practically the same assuming the output from facial recognition is then fed as input to authentication.
That's a false assumption. 2D facial recognition isn't an input to 3D facial authentication.
We are cheating our eyes and brains with 3D goggles.

Don't you think you are too enthusiastic saying 3D facial authentication cannot be fooled?

> Don't you think you are too enthusiastic saying 3D facial authentication cannot be fooled?

Where did I say that?