|
|
|
|
|
by raghavbali
1779 days ago
|
|
Well, I agree to your point that the explainability is only as good as the features used in the model. Yet it is important to attribute the correct set of features (along with quantification) for a given instance. The SHAP framework does that to a good extent but it's focus is not towards helping with identification of model parameter related issues. This work here seems to focus on the later and hence I found it a bit different and a refreshing perspective towards the explainability aspect. |
|