[texasbigdata]

Have absolutely zero background knowledge here, but just to be pendantic your argument is structured as a logical fallacy [1].

While we maybe could estimate the relative sizes of the groups you mention and compare them relative to each other to guess the strategy/policy/tactics it's not clear that would be accurate; or maybe we could infer based on some heuristic or metric (like budget being a proxy for headcount), and even then it's not clear how certain that guess would be, so it's not obvious how "we all know" it's 99/1 vs 50/50, vs any other permutation.

Push come to shove would probably agree with your premise and conclusion, and really have no idea, so apologies for being nitpicky; without a background on the technical details it's likely I'm wrong.

[1] https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Alleged...

[bredren]

To add to this, GP: it is enough to simply state facts and how they influence your opinion.

No individual can speak for all readers here on how they view this agency. Attempting to weakens the comment.

[kgarten]

Yes, there is a logical fallacy here. Yet, that does not mean that the initial comment doesn't have a point.

(that's another logical fallacy ...) https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Argumen...