[ajklsdhfniuwehf]

the gpl install argument is a scary tatic that laywers tell their clients something like "if you use linux on your proprietary CD/CI build system that uses a GPLed zlib, now all your source code will have to be open"

it's utter nonsense and pure FUD.

the article everyone is talking about is about valid cases where the build is used a extra step to try to work around the GPL (akin to saying "the developer used gloves to make the code changes to the GPL'd code so it doesn't count as change", it's stupid). but as the author argee, even pointing that stupidity out is bad because it is used as fuel for the actual FUD where people using GPL correctly are mislead about what they must share