|
|
|
|
|
by corpdrone2021
1777 days ago
|
|
I've tried to go over this with my dad and uncles a few times, they're all IT professionals. The theory is essentially that the machines weren't properly secured, they cite some provision of AZ election law that I don't recall precisely which states that if the machines aren't air-gapped the election is invalid and must be rerun. They think the routers are the proof that the rules were broken and thus will force a revote. When pressed they never can really articulate a specific theory of fraud, just that the rules were broken and they're upset when the rules were broken and their guy lost. |
|
So, we don't need to follow the law?
The law is merely advisory and doesn't require our adherence?
Would you be this unaffected by violations of the law if your guy hadn't won?