|
|
|
|
|
|
by egberts
1788 days ago
|
|
|
A simple logic of NOT “-“ would have blocked any reintroduction/upgrade of unintended “-“ package, coupled with a inertiazed package replacing the accidentally-introduced “-“ package. Yeah, those who depend on the original but accidental “-“ package for its functionally should suffer any consequential breakage that may have resulted from it. *insert*fake*tear*here* |
|
|