|
|
|
|
|
by NY_Entrepreneur
5438 days ago
|
|
I wrote a post that was widely misunderstood. So, I responded with the style of (1), (2), (3), etc. to say JUST what I was claiming and to support my claims in a way that even a good present or would be Google employee could understand! So, yes, I'm "pedantic": Considering the complaints about what I posted, the 'pedantry' was, unfortunately, necessary. "Google is an engineering company". My Ph.D. is in engineering! Google should be a good place for people with my qualifications. That it is not is Google's failure, not mine. For where I would be "better off working", I agree that I have better alternatives than Google, especially now if not when I had a Google interview. My main point is nothing like your objections to my posts: Instead, my main point is just that the Google recruiting process is a mess. I am not the subject here; Google's recruiting process is! Making me the subject is confused based on some emotional instead of rational reactions. So, come on, hard nosed, highly rational, detail-oriented software 'engineers': Stay on the subject -- Google's recruiting, not me! |
|