|
|
|
|
|
by anon_tor_12345
1780 days ago
|
|
lol people don't understand that science at gerard 't hooft's level is just as petty and vulgar as your local bar. what i mean is very accomplished scientists brag and sneer and bluster all the time - they feel entitled to and we worship and empower them to. examples abound; read any of feynman's books; landau had a scale by which he measured other scientists; von neumann would chew people out who couldn't keep up with him; the cat fight right now around Mochizuki's proof; etc etc etc. if you've never been around these people you think they're saints when in fact they're almost universally assholes. it's not unlike ultra-wealthy people competing with each other for the greatest monument to their wealth... i'm sure someone will respond to me to say something like they need to be this way to accomplish (just like with the slavish worship of the ultra wealthy) what they've accomplished and to this i always present to them john bardeen, who won two nobels and still managed to be a good neighbor. |
|
This does not match my experience, and outside the classroom I have been in 1:1 or 2:1 situations with several Nobel prize winners. I'm commenting on individual demeanor, not whatever happens when departmental politics plays out.
As you describe Bardeen, I would take that to be the norm.
Edit: That much said, the topic article rubs me the wrong way. As someone above says, the tone is harsh.