|
|
|
|
|
by teknopurge
1782 days ago
|
|
Honestly not trolling - I disagree with the "ticking time bombs" comment. If you feel that way the devs should be using Rust. C is a sharp knife with no handle; this is it's purpose as a language and tool. cc: theo@openbsd.org |
|
Yes, they should. Or several other things depending on what exactly they need.
> C is a sharp knife with no handle; this is it's purpose as a language and tool.
Help me out here HN resident survivalists, carpenters, maybe circus knife throwers. What is the "purpose" of a "sharp knife with no handle" exactly? How often have you thought, "Man, it'd be so much easier to gather firewood, carve decorations or score a bullseye if only the blade would sink into my own flesh while I was using it because it doesn't have a handle" ?
Historically the argument was, "We're using C because alternatives like Java or Python or whatever aren't fast enough or capable enough". OK. But, somewhere in the last few years it moved to, "We're using C because alternatives aren't dangerous enough" and that's crazy.