|
|
|
|
|
by ingas
1782 days ago
|
|
> Arguing over dictionary definitions is not going to lead to anything useful in this matter. > If we are going to be pedantic The whole article was about going to be pedantic over dictionary definitions. "Now, one major concern in academia is rigor. Academics like to get deep into a topic, examine the nuances, and bring clarity." I suppose it's hard to argue against that words in "technical debt" were chosen poorly: it's not debt and it's not technical. Maybe better definition is needed. |
|