|
|
|
|
|
by kstrauser
1786 days ago
|
|
> Can you call it Itanic if it was around for more than a decade because of how well it sold It didn't sell well, though. At all. > and how many supercomputers chose to use it? Here's a chart of supercomputer architecture by year: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Processor_families_i... Itanium showed up around 2001, peaked in 2003 at about 100 systems, and was nearly gone by 2007. However good it might have been hypothetically -- and I contend that it wasn't -- it was a market disaster. |
|