|
|
|
|
|
by pdimitar
1786 days ago
|
|
We should periodically make sure we use common terms, yes, but I find the author's tone hugely inappropriate. He seems a bit rebellious against the notion of "technical debt to the masses means something else than it means to me". Statistically and historically speaking, he's waging a losing battle and I find myself not interested about what he believes technical debt is. Furthermore, what academia thinks of technical debt is seriously irrelevant. Academics don't write code for a living. Their take on this matter isn't super important. |
|
I initially agree strongly, but then I remember that labs maintain FORTRAN codebases for years. So I'm curious about their view of technical debt, but its definitely in a different context.