|
|
|
|
|
by kumarvvr
1788 days ago
|
|
Sure. But what would be your position, if, as a neutral carrier and a profit making business, FB sets up a system of taking money & promoting content (whatever the content) ? Would you be ok with FB promoting glorification of white supremacy? Because, as a neutral carrier, it is not supposed to look at the content. Would you support it promoting a content piece that is a fluff of falsehoods resting on a thin layer or truth (They are making all the frogs gay !) ? FB could always argue that it is not responsible for content on its servers and can always argue that the counter point is also allowed. What if corporations, with their infinite marketing budgets start using FB to start promoting that climate change is actually good for the world? |
|