|
|
|
|
|
|
by benjohnson
1791 days ago
|
|
|
That's an interesting point - if indeed Facebook is providing a service, then using that logic they can't discriminate on providing that service for a protected class engaging in speech if they provide the same service to the public. If we are going to be consistent on what a service is, and what speech is allowed on a service, this could get really interesting. |
|
|