|
|
|
|
|
|
by ttsiodras
1793 days ago
|
|
|
> I wonder if using RLE encoding would not have been but vastly simpler and more compact... No, mate - it wouldn't. Don't be confused by the "printf"-dump; the Python script processed it into pairs of (frequency,delay). That is, when you see... 989 Hz @ 15209
989 Hz @ 15213
989 Hz @ 15218
784 Hz @ 15222
784 Hz @ 15226
...the data actually generated are: (989, 15222-15209),
(784, ... -15222),
Simply put: RLE can't do anything on them. The repetition has already been "cleaned out".I wouldn't have gone to Huffman compression if I had a simpler choice. |
|
|