[nine_k]

This is very rational of them. They position themselves as a pipe for "bytes", not "content".

By ignoring the content they serve, they rid themselves of the necessity to analyze and judge what they serve. Not only would this require a brain the size of a planet and the expense of running it, but also would inevitably conflict with someone else's judgments, and bring various PR woes.

They don't analyze the internals of their traffic the way internet backbone providers don't analyze the internals of the traffic they pass around.

I frankly find this position superior: imho it does more good by preventing censorship than harm by serving good-intentioned and bad-intentioned customers alike.