[OrvalWintermute]

> It reads to me more like technical specs for a sex doll or maybe dating simulator software

Most species have some selectivity used for determining mates, as well as reproductive strategies.

There is no shame in having a relationship with someone you find physically and mentally attractive.

After all, if children are the biggest investment in your life, may as well have them with someone you love.

[ekster]

I didn’t get the sense that the post I replied to was concerned with love or personality traits for their mating procedure as described. It was a list of physical attributes or tolerances like you might have for an object like a wrench or car.

[OrvalWintermute]

Elements of attractiveness are merely entry points if you will.

Most western heterosexual women prefer men that are tall and have good facial symmetry. My gay friend told me he likes lumberjack types with heavy musculature. I personally prefer a taller woman with a good hip to waist ratio.

I wouldn't shame a woman for liking what she likes, nor would I shame my friend for his preferences. Nor should Cis hetero men be shamed for what they like. It is an individual decision.

There is a great deal more to relationship success beyond mere attractiveness. But, it has to start somewhere.

[vmception]

You are looking for a dissertation full of disclaimers to satisfy your sensitivities, following an article about a smell-dating event. This might be the moment where you take a step back and wonder why you are worried about this so much.

[ekster]

Probably just run into one too many incels on the internet with similar points of view that I am reading into this.