[blendergeek]

> The big GPLv3 push and development - plenty of attacks on folks actually shipping product on GPLv2 and building communities around that model (which keeps software free but allows users of the software to do what they want with it pretty much including putting in devices that are locked down - cars / tivo's etc).

The users of the software are the owners of the devices. The distributors are the ones locking down the devices to prevent the users from modifying the software (often so that the distributors can control something else the users are doing).

GPL is about end-user freedom (as opposed to software distributor freedom). This is why GPLv3 exists.

[slownews45]

GPL used to be targeted at DEVELOPERS of software - the share and share alike model. These developers would in some cases use the GPL'ed software in locked down devices (many / most android devices are pretty locked down - but developers contribute to a GPL kernel).

So yes, FSF created GPLv3 to focus on USERS freedoms, but the users are not writing the software - so it remains the devs who pick licenses.

[pseudalopex]

The Free Software definition always put users first.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition#T...

[goodpoint]

I've never met a developer who is not a user.