You are missing the point of the complaint, which is that it's a private decision to hold that policy. Maybe it was a bad idea to use the word "line", but the intent still stands unadressed.
Yes. Also to the incident where they stopped hosting 8chan after they vowed to never take sides again.
You can agree with Cloudlare not providing services to those sites as much as you want, but you cannot pretend that Cloudflare hosts everyone equally. They cannot use that as an excuse to not deal with spammers.
> All I'm saying is that we won't know until they come under pressure again
That's also true of people who haven't murdered anyone yet, though.
Whom do you trust more? The person who did something and vowed to never do it again, or the person who didn't vow anything? I tend to prefer the former.
However, I do agree - privacy unveiling like that should require a judge's order.