[trutannus]

These things are cool, but I find ultimately things like this end up just being a more natural language like programming language. There will generally be ways you have to phrase your query to get the algorithm to understand it. Having to make sure the interpreter can understand you, and debugging your query to me takes away all the advantage of a tool like this. You end up with syntax and keywords, all features of a language, but instead of getting them from a documentation page, you have to bash your head against the interpreter to figure them out.

Same thing with no-code platforms. They're great until you have to understand why the code generator spat out something that's throwing incomprehensible errors. For example, try debugging compiled typescript for an idea of how autogenerated code debugging works out.

[sharikone]

Exactly. I hate those things so much. In some cruel perversion of benevolence to give you a "friendlier" interface they build something you have to no idea how to tail for your own needs.

Reminds me of Google search (remember when you could write logic queries?) and chatbots

[trutannus]

> remember when you could write logic queries

Those were the days... before Googledorking ruined it for everyone.

[mycall]

On the other hand, if you can make 100 really useful queries and package them, perhaps they could be sold.

[trutannus]

Doubt it. Were I given the option of "buy 100 queries that work" or "have an existing engineer code out the solution", I'd never pick the other option. Ever.