|
|
|
|
|
by BadInformatics
1790 days ago
|
|
> Revise.jl inside the REPL is annoying as hell to use when you start messing with structs. > And Revise.jl kind of proves the fact that incremental compilation is entirely possible. If it wasn't possible at all due to $maximum_dynamic_insanity that wouldn't even work. I agree it's disengenuous to say that Revise is the answer to all problems when struct redefinition is still not possible. Yes you can toss them in a module, but then why allow defining them in global scope at all? Thus far I haven't seen any theoretical limitations either, since Common Lisp variants seem to be able to do something similar. That said, I would not look at most other dynamic languages for this. Having a mandatory VM is an express non-goal in Julia, and if you want one then you'll have to face off against all the other people asking for better static compilation. Again, compiled lisps show us that a VM isn't even necessary to get this level of dynamism or low latency incremental compilation. The claim around having to recompile the entire world has already been addressed in a sibling thread, so I'll not rehash it here. |
|