|
|
|
|
|
|
by vcavallo
1785 days ago
|
|
|
So if I declare you to be an idiot nobody ever has to listen to anything you have to say in the future? Aside from the obvious problems of how to determine “established oneself as an idiot”, what implications does this have for the concept of redemption? |
|
|
People don't change without an impetus to change. Since the majority of the complaints that Sanger has had with wikipedia can be equated to the false balance logical fallacy and Sanger opens the video with the false balance logical fallacy then Sanger has continued to establish that he is in fact an idiot. Pretty easy to dismiss. You can declare me to be an idiot. You clearly don't care what anyone has to say, you seem to have an agenda, I don't know what it is or why you're so hot under the collar about this but I could call you an idiot as well and dismiss what you have to say. As a matter of fact...