You are right. But I read this as someones collection of ideas anways not as universal priciples that must be applied everywhere. I tend to favourably read into other peoples statements if in doubt (especially on HN)
> I tend to favourably read into other peoples statements if in doubt (especially on HN)
That's a commendable character trait, but if you have to twist a "heuristic" beyond recognizability for it to make any sense, then what's the purpose of that heuristic?
Hard agree. A heuristic can only be said to work if it means the same thing to everyone. Like, if the list means anything to everyone, then how can we say that the list is responsible for success or failure?
Otherwise what are we saying the causality is? Like, that the list is just somehow inspiring everyone to be successful? So, like, if we just believe enough in the list we'll get it done? No thanks. I'm not going to pray to some poetry.
That's a commendable character trait, but if you have to twist a "heuristic" beyond recognizability for it to make any sense, then what's the purpose of that heuristic?