|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
1794 days ago
|
|
The state's monopoly, qua Max Weber, is on the legitimate use of violence. All three words matter: state, monopoly, and legitimate. That is, the right and legitimacy of that right, is restricted to the state. Absent this, one of three conditions exist; 1. There is no monopoly. In which case violence is widespread. 2. There is no legitimacy. In which case violence is capricious. This is tyranny or unaccountable power. 3. Some non-state power or agent assumes the monopoly on legitimate violence. In which case it becomes, by definition the State. The state's claim is to legitimacy. A capricious exercise would be an abrogation of legitimacy |
|