|
|
|
|
|
|
by klunger
1794 days ago
|
|
|
The source is a summary of the position of the 9 major political parties on further oil exploration. There are dozens of parties here, yes, but the 9 listed there account for about 92% of the population. They are all the ones that have representation in parliament at the moment. The views of the parties express anywhere from complete support to complete opposition to further drilling, with some compromise positions as well. If you compare that with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_N... how much each party has representation in parliament at the moment, you will see that a large swath of the population is opposed to it. However, because of the way that the parliament system works here, this issue is not correctly represented in current policy. |
|
|
The only way to show actual public support/opposition for the issue is to do just that, everything else is not really a valid substitute. You may be right about the actual public support, but without actually showing the data for it, it remains speculation.
> However, because of the way that the parliament system works here, this issue is not correctly represented in current policy.
How would you change the system to avoid such a misrepresentation of public opinion in actual policy/legislation? If there is such massive public support, what would be the fallout from just not approving north sea exploration?